The 2011 standard defines RPP in section 3E as follows: "Relative Positional Preceision" means the length of the semi-major axis, expressed in feet or meters, of the error ellipse representing the uncertainty due to random erros in surveyed property relative to the monument, or witness, marking any other corner of the surveyed property at the 95 percent conficent level.
Section 3Ev further states that "The maximum allowable Relative Positional Precision for an ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey is 2 cm (0.07 feet) plus 50 parts per million (based on the direct distance between the two corners being tested)."
Based on this defintion, you will want to evaluate the semi-major ellipse values (Su) for the corners of the surveyed property. In a typical property survey where the PPM errors are very small, you will want to ensure that the Su values are less than 2 cm or 0.07 feet.
In addition to checking the Su values, you can also ask TPC to include the Relative Position Precision report.
This report accounts for the line of sight distance between each corner be adjusted and the fixed control points in the survey. Although this does not allow the flexibility to compute RPP between any 2 corners, it does provide maximum allowable errors (consider this to be the maximum Su allowed). You will want to check the Su values of survey corners with the maximum values computed in this report. See the example below.
[ Error Ellipse ]
Station Su (semi-major axis)
1 0.023
2 0.024
3 0.026
4 0.021
5 0.024
[ Relative Positional Precision (RPP)]
Maximum allowable RPP based on 0.07 Feet and 50 ppm
Station From
1 from A1=0.0712' A2=0.0723'
2 from A1=0.0719' A2=0.0727'
3 from A1=0.0717' A2=0.0721'
4 from A1=0.0728' A2=0.0729'
5 from A1=0.0726' A2=0.0725'
Least Squares
Least Squares Blunder Detection
Premium, Professional